Ok...
I can see why people are jumping up to argue with the people who are giving it low scores, but I think you're doing that for the sake of trying to sound creative.
Yes, to an extent it inspires, but it's extremely poor at doing so. If I wanted to build an experimental flash (it's barely even a flash btw) which used symbolic methods to create a story, I could do hell of a lot better than this.
So why am I giving it a low score? Not because it's a faint narrative, but because I've seen things like this done far, far better in the past. It's ironic that people are complaining the low-score-reviewers have no imagination, when the author alone seems to have very little. You don't push the boundaries at all, sorry.